Portable data warehouses from Silicon Power
Measurements were performed using a configuration equipped with ASUS P5Q Deluxe running a 64-bit Windows Vista SP2 with a Yorkfiled CPU. We tested our M10 SSD only on the eSATA entrance of the above mentioned motherboard, as we already know what USB 2.0 is capable of. Let’s not even pull it off, let’s see the results!
First of all the HDTunewe took out the one with which we dropped the virgin tests (here we mean the unpartitioned state):
250 GB HDD (read / write)
320 GB HDD (read / write)
SSD (read / write)
Of course we introduced the PCMark05also installed this time on a 32-bit Windows 7 RC. Let's see the results of HDD Suite in tabular form:
250 GB | 320 GB | SSD | |
Total score | 3314 | 3269 | 11773 |
Start XP (MB / s) | 7,05 | 7,24 | 30,24 |
Application load (MB / s) | 5,91 | 5,72 | 26,39 |
General usage (MB / s) | 4,61 | 4,15 | 20,08 |
Virus scan (MB / s) | 30,51 | 30,51 | 113,93 |
Writing (MB / s) | 28,09 | 29,3 | 50,99 |
The total score of an SSD is three times that of any HDD, which is no coincidence - let’s just look at the partial results. Not all raw performance is well exemplified by the competition between the two magnetic storage devices, as while he beat his little brother high in the 320GB HDTune, he snatched the PCMark250 from the 05GB hard drive, albeit in a close fight. based on.
Finally, as a summary, let's look at Everest measurements in the form of screenshots:
250 and 320 GB as well as the SSD
