Introducing the Enermax NAXN 80+ power supply family

We did not exaggerate the testing, we only used a multimeter for the measurement, although it is a showy instrument to minimize any inertia and also see the oscillations. The configuration used for the test was as follows:

We looked at the consumption values ​​in both loaded and unloaded conditions, although we mention this only incidentally, because there is no benchmark against which to measure whether the numbers show a favorable value.

These numbers would be important in order to see whether the 80+ efficiency is achieved, that is, that the power supply unit uses at least 80 percent of the consumed energy to operate the machine, and "heats" 20 percent or less.

With the multimeter measurement, we could monitor the stresses of each branch during operation. Needless to say, we did not experience any glaring irregularities. The maximum was 3,3- and the minimum was 3,39 on the 3,33-volt branch, although these values ​​were 5-5,18 on the 5,09-volt branch and 12-12,01 on the 12,79-volt branch.

We can’t say it’s perfect, especially the maximum value of the 12-volt branch, but it’s also bad just compared to an Enermax.

What can we say in summary? The fact that we find CWT insides in an Enermax diet is definitely sad, but it’s also mostly just because Enermax feeds aren’t cheap. The surplus we pay for them at the cash registers is exactly the surplus that the metal house contains. The electronics of the CWT, however, did not perform badly, so the only negative we can bring up against it is that we can get a unit with similar capabilities cheaper. Even so, if someone wants an Enermax branded but affordable power supply in their machine, feel free to buy it, you certainly won’t be disappointed with it.

For the test, the Enermax power supplies were used From Bluechip we received, thank you! Current prices of NAXN feeds IDE click to see.